DecisionCompass: AI Multiplayer Wargaming Simulations
Decision Advantage AI Inc. · Intelligence & Research
Certification per Microsoft Marketplace.
Evidence tier Source Confirmed · 7 captures on record
What the publisher says
As described on Microsoft Marketplace.
Struggling to generate defensible COAs fast, understand the reasoning behind them, and retain documentation from every sim?
DecisionCompass is an AI-enabled, multiplayer wargaming environment for defense teams that need: (1) computational power for rapid scenario iteration, (2) decision reasoning that supports COA comparison, and (3) repeatable documentation that preserves what happened—and why—across past simulations.
Show the rest of the publisher’s description (45 more lines)
In contested, fast-changing environments, the best teams don’t just plan—they rehearse decisions. DecisionCompass supports collaborative Red vs. Blue play, accelerated action–reaction cycles, and structured analysis that helps commanders and staffs pressure-test options, surface assumptions, and align on a course of action with confidence.
WHO IT’S FOR
- Commanders and staff, operational planners, wargaming cells
- Training/exercise designers; PME institutions
- Defense organizations conducting operational design, contingency planning, and decision rehearsal
WHAT IT DELIVERS
Compute for rapid iteration
- Run dynamic scenarios and iterate as constraints and intelligence change
- Explore multiple COAs, branches, and sequels without rebuilding the setup
Reasoning to support COA selection
- AI-generated decision matrix / heat map for side-by-side COA comparison
- Sensitivity analysis to reveal key drivers, risk tradeoffs, and fragile assumptions
- Clear rationale to support briefings, review, and decision governance
Documentation and institutional memory
- Retain assumptions, inputs, decisions, results, and reasoning from each simulation
- Enable consistent after-action reflection and trend learning over time
- Keep decision artifacts organized and retrievable for review and compliance
TOP DEFENSE USE CASES
- COA analysis for operational planning and contingency response
- Decision rehearsal under time pressure and incomplete information
- Mission-tailored Red vs. Blue wargames
- Risk/assumption testing (“what must be true” for success)
- After-action learning (AAR) to improve decision quality
HOW IT WORKS
*
Frame the dilemma: narrative + files + API (optional voice-to-text)
*
Collaborate: Red vs. Blue action–reaction cycles and assumption updates
*
Analyze: decision matrix/heat map + sensitivity analysis
*
Export: recommendations, rationale, and artifacts for briefings and AAR
WHY DEFENSE TEAMS CHOOSE IT
- Faster wargaming cycles without losing rigor
- Better alignment through explicit assumptions and tradeoffs
- Decision outputs leaders can brief and defend
- Institutional memory from a record of past simulations
DEPLOYMENT / SECURITY / DATA
Designed for defense environments where data control and auditability matter. Deployment options: cloud, private cloud, or on-prem (as supported). Data handling: encryption, access controls, audit logging, and retention policies (as configured). Integrations: API connectivity and import/export for operational artifacts. Security and deployment documentation available on request.
SUPPORT
Documentation, training & onboarding, and technical support included.
CREDIBILITY
Used by innovators at the U.S. Army War College for advanced decision simulations.
Schedule a demo to see a Red vs. Blue scenario, COA comparison heat map, sensitivity analysis, and the documentation package from a completed simulation.
Schedule a demo
Preview
1 image
Agent build and provenance
See the full provenance
The layer-by-layer build, the evidence behind each claim, the risk basis and the cross-marketplace links are open to any account. Some rows are disclosed, some the source leaves Unknown; a free account shows you which.
Compliance
- FedRAMPConfirmedNot listed90%, registry-checkedNo FedRAMP Marketplace entry matched this vendor's domain, checked 2026-08-27registry recordas observed 2026-08-27
Confirmed means matched to a public authoritative registry. Claimed means the vendor or its listing states it, not yet cross-checked. A framework not shown was not found in any source we hold, which is not evidence against it. Not listed means a scoped registry check found no match for this vendor's domain: a No is a scoped registry check, not a compliance judgment. Confidence bands: 95% domain-verified, 90% registry-checked, 80% self-attested, 70% weak signal. Self-attested items marked “vendor's site” are gathered from the vendor's own website and are not verified by us.
Sources
Publisher resources
3 linksLinked repositories
Unknown means this listing does not publish a repository. It is not a statement that the code is closed, and a linked repository is not a claim that the publisher wrote it: the registry computes that relationship privately and does not publish it.
Evidence risk is the share of the build you cannot see before you deploy, not a security rating. Sign in to see the layer-by-layer basis for this band.